Beautiful, publication-ready product images, automatically generated from a single 3D model. Any angle, any lighting, zero post-production. Every season.
Beautiful, publication-ready product images, automatically generated from a single 3D model. Any angle, any lighting, zero post-production. Every season.
Two minutes on how one 3D model replaces your entire content workflow, and opens up new ones.
40,669,736 end-user interactions last 12 months
Every new SKU means another shoot. Every season means reshooting carry-overs. Costs scale linearly, quality varies, and timelines slip.
$20-$90 per image + $25-$150 post-production per image. A 50-SKU season can cost $25,000-$100,000 in photography alone. Double the products = double the budget.
Products that continue across seasons need reshooting for visual consistency — costing 25-50% of the original session. The same shoe, shot again and again.
Different photographers, equipment, and studios produce different outputs. Color-critical products with inaccurate imagery see return rates up to 78% higher.
The traditional cycle, planning, shipping, shooting, post-processing, approval, takes 2-8 weeks. Every week of delay on a seasonal product is lost revenue.
90% of online shoppers say photo quality is the #1 factor. Products with multiple angles see an average 58% sales boost. 22% of returns happen because products look different in person.
Scan a shoe once — get publication-ready product images from any angle, in any format, with perfect consistency. No photographer, no studio, no post-production.
Complete flexibility in camera position and lighting setup. Right, left, back, top, detail — define your template once, render every product identically.
Output to whatever image specifications your channels require. Web, marketplace, print — one asset serves them all.
Same virtual lighting rig, same angles, same background. No photographer variability, no studio inconsistency. Spring 2023 and Fall 2025 look identical.
An argument for not making traditional product images anymore is the significant cost and time involved. If something can't be fixed in post-production, it must be reshot. With Fibbl, all of these hassles simply vanish.
Gustaf Jernberg Production Lead, GANT
10+ years in photo production
Packshots are automatically included when we create a 3D model, not an extra cost or separate workflow.
Ship shoe samples to our scanning studio. Hundreds to thousands at a time.
Our automated pipeline produces photorealistic 3D models at scale.
Packshots auto-generated from your templates — your angles, lighting, specs.
One 3D asset powers packshots, video, 3D viewer, AR — no rework.
They're virtually indistinguishable. Our co-founder has challenged audiences to tell the difference — most can't. GANT's production lead, with 10+ years in photo production, confirmed the quality is higher than their previous photography supplier.
GANT achieved 50% cost savings on 350 shoes. Kybun Joya's co-CEO noted the cost is roughly the same as photography alone — but you get 3D models, packshots, video, and AR all included.
No — that's one of the biggest advantages. The 3D model persists, so if a shoe carries over to next season, new images are generated instantly without shipping products or booking a photographer.
GANT cut their approval time from 2 days to 1, and the delivered images require zero post-production. The end-to-end pipeline handles hundreds to thousands of products at a time.
Yes. You define your templates once — angles, lighting rig, background, export format — and every product is rendered consistently to those specs. Any adjustments are made digitally, not in a studio.
We'll help you get started and align your strategy with your business goals to ensure you get the most out of our product.